彭丽媛堂弟祁东县长彭丽堂，任上被查。胡温掌权痕迹明显，司马南案，李嘉诚案，富察案都说明问题。肯尼迪案档案完全解密
彭丽媛堂弟祁东县长彭丽堂，任上被查。胡温掌权痕迹明显，司马南案，李嘉诚案，富察案都说明问题。肯尼迪案档案完全解密
大家好，欢迎来到我的频道，最近的时事，很明显都是胡温在掌权的痕迹。之前我给大家总结了，胡锦涛温家宝在垂帘听政的迹象。外交方面有10个动作。李嘉诚卖巴拿马运河可以算作第11个动作。这些操作手法，明显和习近平过去12年大相径庭。你可以说习近平改了外交风格，这就是扯淡，实际上习近平早就不掌握大权了。李嘉诚这件事情也可以算作内政，因为还包括对私营企业的态度，战胜于朝廷，内政外交是一体的。司马南案和富察案可以算作内政方面的，富察案也是外交。
首先判断谁掌权这是逻辑前提，先得搞清楚一个大前提：现在北京到底是习近平掌权，还是胡锦涛掌权？这个判断错了，后面的结论就站不住脚。我说是胡锦涛让李嘉诚把巴拿马运河卖了在前，大公报对李嘉诚的批评降调在后，李强请李嘉诚的儿子去北京，成为座上宾在后。
美国国防部长赫格塞思已经给中国下最后通牒了，林剑说了一句不管冷战还是热战。美国国防部长亲口说的，美国做好准备了，要和美国热战这不是疯了吗？巴拿马运河是美国的红线，中国如果不想和美国战略对抗，那就趁早，痛快卖掉。这个不是可以拿出来当作谈判的筹码。
北京一开始反应很激烈。《大公报》连发好几篇评论，骂李嘉诚“卖国”“出卖全体中国人民”，说这交易损害国家安全，威胁中国外贸利益。香港中联办和港澳办还把这些文章转到官网上，摆明了是北京的官方态度。骂李嘉诚就是苦肉计，演双簧，骂两句是做给外人看的，实际操作上他的有别的打算。才骂了两句就心疼了，香港的中共党报大公报就出来降调，连长和的名字都不敢提了。这明显就是被他们的主子呵斥了。
让你们吓唬吓唬，你还当真了。
2025年3月23日，李嘉诚的次子李泽楷以盈科拓展集团创办人的身份，参加了在北京举办的中国发展高层论坛，还跟总理李强一起拍了大合照。论坛上有不少重量级人物，比如财政司司长陈茂波、港交所主席唐家成，还有苹果的蒂姆·库克、辉瑞的CEO等。李泽楷虽然没公开讲话，但能出席这种场合，还跟李强合影，明显是个信号。
更耐人寻味的是，《大公报》的态度变了。之前《大公报》骂得可狠了，说李嘉诚“不爱国”“出卖全体中国人民”，但到了3月22日和25日的报道，调门明显降了。最新文章里，虽然还是要求李家停止交易，但不再提“卖国”这种重话，反而开始“同情”李家，说他们是被美国欺负逼的，还把矛头转向美国，批评美国的霸权本质。最后说实话了，李嘉诚就是中共的人，和中共是一家人。文章还提到，李家这次交易没提前跟“有关方面”沟通，等于点名批评他们没跟港府和中央商量，但也透露出“下不为例”的意思，好像是给李家留了台阶。
这就是扯淡啊，就是白区党，身份早就暴露了，还在那儿装呢。李嘉诚不是中共的人，他儿子怎么成为总理李强的座上宾了。还说李嘉诚没有事先跟有关方面沟通。这双簧演的，就是李嘉诚不但要替中共办事，还要提中共背黑锅。
李嘉诚这件事情的操作手法和司马南一样，都是胡温的路数。跟现在对比一下。胡锦涛和温家宝主政那会儿，抓人从来不太用“寻衅滋事”“妄议中央”这种违背现代法治的由头，基本都是真犯罪。这是一个客观事实，2012年胡温掌权的时候中国寻衅滋事罪只有2万，到了2018年习包子掌权，已经飙升到6万了。后来就不公布这个数据了。套用中国外交官沙祖康的话，中国的人权状况比美国好5倍。习包子使用寻衅滋事罪的比胡温一年多4万，是胡温3倍，这是一个客观的数据。
下面这个说法是网友的说法，我不完全背书，引用作为对比
中国无官不贪，一抓一个准，这个不用多说。但抓意见领袖也得有依据，比如薛蛮子是因为嫖娼，证据确凿，也可能仙人跳。就算仙人跳也得拿出证据，起码是构陷一个证据。像李承鹏、韩寒这种身家清白的，在胡温时期一直可以公开唱反调，没被收拾。李承鹏和韩寒，我不知道他们不不是真的唱反调，真的身家清白。香港民主派新星何伟途，也是因为嫖娼，人证物证俱在，香港人想帮他都没辙。
如果胡温非要抓黎智英，肯定也是用商业犯罪的罪名，而且得是实打实的——做生意做得大，多少有点擦边的事儿，抓起来有理有据。
反观习近平这几年，抓人就没那么讲究了。比如香港反对派，直接用政治罪抓捕，公然违背《中英联合声明》的承诺，搞得很难看。黎智英被抓，用的就是《国安法》，明摆着是政治打压，跟胡温时期的风格完全不一样。
这一段是网友的观点不是我的观点
这次搞司马南，习包子绥化帮马仔，直接罚了900万，罪名是偷税漏税，证据确凿。这手法完全是胡温时期的配方和味道。司马南是薄熙来的马仔，是习包子的马仔，胡温早就想整司马南了。那也不能凭空来呀，假装要有证据啊。
胡温用刀叉吃人，习近平拿手吃人
说到胡温跟习近平的区别，咱可以用个比喻来说清楚。一个非洲酋长的儿子去伦敦留学回来，把西方文明介绍给族人，儿子同学问酋长：“想必你们族人的教育提升不少吧？”酋长回答：“当然，我们吃人已经开始使用刀叉了。”胡温那会儿就是用刀叉吃人，习近平现在是直接拿手吃人。胡温时期好歹讲究点形式，表面上还像那么回事，其实还是独裁。习近平这边呢，干脆撕破脸，连装都不装了。胡温就说说我们用刀叉吃人了，你还要啥自行车啊？他们自己觉得已经算是“文明”的了。
再看最近的一个事儿，李延贺富察被轻判，也能看出点胡温的痕迹。李延贺富察，被判了3年，但实际已经关了2年，等于只判了1年。如果是习近平大权在握，这种案子肯定往重里判，甚至可能直接无期徒刑，因为就是中级人民法院审判。现在被轻判，还是在侵犯人权，就是胡温垂帘听政了，吃人改用刀叉了，但是他们不否认自己的国家机器啊。不要对独裁者抱有不切实际的幻想啊。
再看中国外交部的表态，3月18日，中国外交部发言人毛宁回应李嘉诚出售巴拿马运河的时候，主要谴责美国的霸凌行为，没直接点名批评李嘉诚。这跟《大公报》后来的调门是一致的，说明胡温发话了，胡温垂帘听政也不是什么事情都管。李强把李嘉诚的儿子请过去，有可能说明李嘉诚是江泽民的白手套。李强是江泽民的人。
湖南省衡阳市纪委监委3月22日消息，湖南省祁东县委副书记、县长彭丽堂涉嫌严重违纪违法，目前正接受衡阳市纪委监委纪律审查和监察调查。网传彭丽堂是彭丽媛的表弟，是许达哲重点栽培培养的对象。报道显示，3月5日，彭丽堂出席了公开活动。彭丽堂曾搭班子的祁东县委书记杜登峰，2022年任怀化市副市长，今年2月被撤职。此外，今年3月2日消息，祁东县委常委、政法委书记官三元被查。衡阳市纪委监委曾报道，2022年8月22日，彭丽堂给妻子写了一封家书。身为一县之长，要为你和女儿做好清正廉洁榜样，彭丽堂希望妻子，时刻提醒并监督，珍惜党和人民赋予的职责和荣誉，保持清醒头脑，慎用手中权力，管好自己的生活圈、交往圈、娱乐圈。
这名网友说，看来江泽民当时不退出军委主席的做法是对的
我的回复是，这话说得不错，，因为是比较流行的一个观点，习包子上台之前就这么装，谁能想到他会是这德行呢？就像那句老话：
周公恐懼流言日
王莽謙恭下士時
若使當時便身死
千古忠佞有誰知
温家宝说知我罪我其惟春秋。
我给大家总结一下，江泽民留任两年军委主席，当年被骂恋栈权力，现在被说成策略大师。很明显，如果胡锦涛也学江泽民一样留任两年军委主席，习近平就没有时间和空间修改在19大修改宪法，妄图终身连任。胡锦涛还能把胡春华扶进政治局常委，扶上马送一程吗，那么胡春华接班习近平就成为定局了。习近平想三连任也没戏，只能是白日做梦。温家宝当在任的时候被说成影帝，现在又说习近平演都不演了。
习近平被吹成改革家习仲勋的儿子，但其实习仲勋压根不是啥改革家，都是朱镕基和习近平花钱包装出来的。习近平上台前就是个倒车大师、加速大师，他要不上台，谁能想到他是这号人啊？
根子就坏在邓小平这里，正道不走，非要摸石头过河。有民主制度不走。非要搞独裁。说白了还是实用主义，还是不想放弃共产党独裁。明知道按照就旧有的模式，只能把共产党政权搞崩溃，所以要打着改革大旗当作遮羞布，其实毛都没有改。说的好听一点就是只有经济改革，没有政治改革。就设计出来隔代指定这么个花样。没有民主制度的制约，到习近平这里就实在玩不下去了。只能靠密室政治和权谋，江泽民留任两年军委主席，还歪打正着了。
本来到习近平这里已经玩不下去了，胡锦涛发动军事政变，通过军事冒险，侥幸暂时取得了成功。也就是说这股余威还在，接替习近平的总书记，他也不敢在终身连任。这只是迫于暂时的政治现实而已。接替习近平的人，但凡有点脑子的，只要脑子没坏，肯定不会学习近平。不是他不想学，而是没有机会，学习近平那就自找死路。再之后的事情，又没谱了，谁也说不准，就等着下一个习近平这样的野心家再冒出来。就是高看共产党了，说到底，共产党能规划出来10年之后的东西就到头了，就不错了，就是脚踩西瓜皮，滑倒那里算哪里。就像那句话，我死之后哪管洪水滔天，能顾好眼前这点事情就不错了。
我们来看看这个大瓜，美国的瓜也挺精彩，吃瓜群众都有些应接不暇了。
我们先简单梳理一下背景：美国四任总统的故事。肯尼迪被中情局干掉，副总统约翰逊接任，干了两届，总共五年多——因为美国总统最多只能连任两届。尼克松在第二任期的时候，被弹劾下台，副总统福特顺势上位，笑眯眯接盘。
我们看推特大威发的这个大瓜，简直要颠覆整个美国历史。中情局干掉了肯尼迪，而沃伦委员会却给中情局擦屁股，把中情局的罪责一笔勾销，赦免了中情局。什么是沃伦委员会？沃伦委员会正是肯尼迪的继任者约翰逊设立的，专门调查肯尼迪死因的小组。
尼克松心里门儿清，尼克松知道中情局谋害了肯尼迪，而水门事件中五名窃贼中有四人居然是中情局特工。中情局故意设局，伪造水门事件，就是为了搞垮尼克松，把尼克松拉下马。福特则是深层政府和中情局推选的尼克松接班人，而福特当年恰好也是沃伦委员会的成员。换句话说，当年放过肯尼迪凶手的正是福特，深层政府是论功行赏，赏赐福特一届总统当当。换个说法，就是当年福特给深层政府纳了投名状，换得了深层政府的信任。
这意味着福特实际上是深层政府的代言人。这很可能就是川普解密肯尼迪档案的核心内容，终极猛料。也就是说，深层政府真实存在。肯尼迪和尼克松虽然分别属于不同的党派，一个民主党一个共和党，但是都因为触动了深层政府的利益，一个被灭口，一个被构陷入局下台。
现在呢，深层政府的老大显然是奥巴马和索罗斯，拜登不过是奥巴马手下的一个跑腿打杂的小跟班，小马仔而已，上不了台面。也就说是2020年到2024年美国没有总统，或者说美国真正的第46届总统是奥巴马，拜登那四年不过是奥巴马的第三任期而已。好的，谢谢大家。
英文翻译
Peng Liyuan’s cousin, Qidong County Magistrate Peng Litang, was investigated while in office. There are obvious signs of Hu and Wen in power, and the Sima Nan case, Li Ka-shing case, and Fu Cha case all illustrate the problem. The Kennedy case files are completely declassified
Hello everyone, welcome to my channel. Recent current events are obviously signs of Hu and Wen in power. I have summarized for you before that there are signs that Hu Jintao and Wen Jiabao are ruling behind the scenes. There are 10 actions in diplomacy. Li Ka-shing’s sale of the Panama Canal can be regarded as the 11th action. These operating methods are obviously very different from Xi Jinping’s past 12 years. You can say that Xi Jinping has changed his diplomatic style, which is nonsense. In fact, Xi Jinping has long lost power. Li Ka-shing’s incident can also be regarded as domestic affairs, because it also includes the attitude towards private enterprises, which is better than the court. Domestic and foreign affairs are integrated. The Sima Nan case and the Fu Cha case can be regarded as domestic affairs, and the Fu Cha case is also diplomatic.
First of all, judging who is in power is a logical premise. We must first clarify a major premise: Is Xi Jinping in power in Beijing or Hu Jintao? If this judgment is wrong, the subsequent conclusion will not stand. I said that Hu Jintao asked Li Ka-shing to sell the Panama Canal first, then the Ta Kung Pao downgraded its criticism of Li Ka-shing, and then Li Qiang invited Li Ka-shing’s son to Beijing and became a guest of honor.
US Secretary of Defense Hegseth has already given China an ultimatum, and Lin Jian said that it doesn’t matter whether it is a cold war or a hot war. The US Secretary of Defense said in person that the United States is ready. Isn’t it crazy to have a hot war with the United States? The Panama Canal is the red line of the United States. If China does not want to confront the United States strategically, it should sell it as soon as possible. This is not something that can be used as a bargaining chip.
Beijing’s reaction was very intense at first. The Ta Kung Pao published several comments in a row, scolding Li Ka-shing for “selling out the country” and “selling out all Chinese people”, saying that this transaction undermined national security and threatened China’s foreign trade interests. The Liaison Office of the Central People’s Government in Hong Kong and the Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office also transferred these articles to their official websites, making it clear that this is Beijing’s official attitude. Scolding Li Ka-shing is a self-torture tactic, a double act, and the scolding is for outsiders to see. In actual operation, he has other plans. He was distressed after just two scoldings, and the Hong Kong Communist Party newspaper Ta Kung Pao came out to lower the tone, and even dared not mention the name of Cheung Wo. This is obviously scolded by their master.
Let you scare, and you take it seriously.
On March 23, 2025, Li Ka-shing’s second son, Richard Li, attended the China Development Forum held in Beijing as the founder of Pacific Century Group, and took a group photo with Premier Li Qiang. There were many heavyweights at the forum, such as Financial Secretary Paul Chan, Chairman of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, Tim Cook of Apple, and CEO of Pfizer. Although Richard Li did not speak publicly, his attendance at such an occasion and taking a photo with Li Qiang were obviously a signal.
What is even more intriguing is that the attitude of the Ta Kung Pao has changed. Previously, the Ta Kung Pao criticized Li Ka-shing harshly, saying that Li Ka-shing was “unpatriotic” and “betrayed all Chinese people”, but in the reports on March 22 and 25, the tone was obviously lowered. In the latest article, although it still asked the Li family to stop the transaction, it no longer mentioned the harsh words “betraying the country”. Instead, it began to “sympathize” with the Li family, saying that they were bullied and forced by the United States. It also turned the spearhead to the United States and criticized the hegemonic nature of the United States. In the end, to tell the truth, Li Ka-shing is a member of the CCP and is one family with the CCP. The article also mentioned that the Li family did not communicate with the “relevant parties” in advance for this transaction, which was equivalent to criticizing them by name for not discussing with the Hong Kong government and the central government, but it also revealed the meaning of “not doing it again next time”, as if leaving a way out for the Li family.
This is nonsense. It is the White Area Party. Its identity has been exposed long ago, but it is still pretending. Li Ka-shing is not a member of the CCP, so how could his son become a guest of Premier Li Qiang. It also said that Li Ka-shing did not communicate with the relevant parties in advance. This double act is that Li Ka-shing not only wants to work for the CCP, but also wants to take the blame for the CCP.
Li Ka-shing’s operation method in this matter is the same as Sima Nan’s, both of which are Hu-Wen’s style. Compare it with now. When Hu Jintao and Wen Jiabao were in power, they never used “picking quarrels and provoking troubles” and “making irresponsible remarks about the central government” as excuses that violate modern rule of law to arrest people. Basically, they were all real crimes. This is an objective fact. When Hu and Wen were in power in 2012, there were only 20,000 cases of provoking troubles in China. By 2018, when Xi Jinping was in power, it had soared to 60,000. Later, this data was not announced. To quote the words of Chinese diplomat Sha Zukang, China’s human rights situation is 5 times better than that of the United States. Xi Jinping used the crime of provoking trouble 40,000 more than Hu and Wen in a year, which is 3 times that of Hu and Wen. This is an objective data.
The following statement is made by netizens. I don’t fully endorse it, but quote it for comparison.
There is no official in China who is not corrupt. Once arrested, one will be accurate. This needs no further explanation. But arresting opinion leaders also requires a basis. For example, Xue Manzi was arrested for soliciting prostitution, and the evidence is solid. It could also be a trap. Even if it is a trap, evidence must be provided, at least a fabricated evidence. People like Li Chengpeng and Han Han, who have clean backgrounds, could have openly sang the opposite tune during the Hu-Wen period without being punished. I don’t know if Li Chengpeng and Han Han really sang the opposite tune and were really innocent. Hong Kong’s rising star in the democratic camp, He Weitu, was also arrested for soliciting prostitution. There are witnesses and evidence, and Hong Kong people can’t help him.
If Hu and Wen insisted on arresting Jimmy Lai, they would definitely use the charge of commercial crime, and it must be real – he has a big business, and there are some borderline things, so there is a reason to arrest him.
In contrast, Xi Jinping has not been so particular about arresting people in recent years. For example, the Hong Kong opposition was directly arrested for political crimes, openly violating the promise of the Sino-British Joint Declaration, which was very ugly. Jimmy Lai was arrested by the National Security Law, which is clearly a political suppression, which is completely different from the style of the Hu-Wen period.
This paragraph is the views of netizens, not mine
This time, when dealing with Sima Nan, Xi Baozi’s Suihua gang henchmen directly fined him 9 million yuan on the charge of tax evasion, with irrefutable evidence. This method is completely the recipe and flavor of the Hu-Wen period. Sima Nan is Bo Xilai’s henchmen, Xi Baozi’s henchmen, and Hu and Wen have long wanted to deal with Sima Nan. That can’t be done out of thin air, pretending to have evidence.
Hu and Wen use knives and forks to eat people, Xi Jinping eats people with his hands
Speaking of the difference between Hu and Wen and Xi Jinping, we can use a metaphor to make it clear. The son of an African chief went to study in London and came back to introduce Western civilization to his tribe. The son’s classmate asked the chief: “I guess the education of your tribe has improved a lot?” The chief replied: “Of course, we have started to use knives and forks to eat people.” Hu and Wen used knives and forks to eat people, and Xi Jinping now eats people directly with his hands. During the Hu-Wen era, at least they paid attention to formalities. On the surface, they looked like they were doing things, but in fact, they were still dictators. On Xi Jinping’s side, they simply tore their faces apart and didn’t even pretend. Hu and Wen said, “We eat people with knives and forks, so what do you want with bicycles?” They think they are already “civilized.”
Another recent incident, Li Yanhe and Fu Cha were given light sentences, which also shows some traces of Hu and Wen. Li Yanhe and Fu Cha were sentenced to 3 years, but they have actually been in prison for 2 years, which means they were only sentenced to 1 year. If Xi Jinping was in power, such cases would definitely be sentenced more severely, and they might even be sentenced to life imprisonment, because it was the Intermediate People’s Court that tried the case. Now that they are given light sentences, they are still violating human rights. Even though Hu and Wen are ruling behind the scenes and eating people with knives and forks, they don’t deny their own state machinery. Don’t have unrealistic fantasies about dictators.
Looking at the statement of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, on March 18, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Mao Ning responded to Li Ka-shing’s sale of the Panama Canal, mainly condemning the bullying behavior of the United States, and did not directly criticize Li Ka-shing by name. This is consistent with the tone of the “Ta Kung Pao” later, indicating that Hu and Wen have spoken, and Hu and Wen are not in charge of everything behind the scenes. Li Qiang invited Li Ka-shing’s son to go over, which may indicate that Li Ka-shing is Jiang Zemin’s white glove. Li Qiang is Jiang Zemin’s man.
According to the Hengyang Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision of Hunan Province on March 22, Peng Litang, deputy secretary of the Qidong County Party Committee and county magistrate of Hunan Province, is suspected of serious violations of discipline and law, and is currently undergoing disciplinary review and supervision investigation by the Hengyang Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision. It is rumored that Peng Litang is Peng Liyuan’s cousin and is the focus of Xu Dazhe’s cultivation. According to reports, on March 5, Peng Litang attended a public event. Du Dengfeng, secretary of the Qidong County Party Committee, who once worked with Peng Litang, served as deputy mayor of Huaihua City in 2022 and was dismissed in February this year. In addition, on March 2 this year, it was reported that Guan Sanyuan, member of the Standing Committee of the Qidong County Party Committee and Secretary of the Political and Legal Affairs Commission, was investigated. The Hengyang Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision reported that on August 22, 2022, Peng Litang wrote a letter to his wife. As the head of a county, you must set a good example of integrity for you and your daughter. Peng Litang hopes that his wife will always remind and supervise, cherish the responsibilities and honors given by the Party and the people, keep a clear head, use the power in your hands carefully, and manage your own life circle, social circle, and entertainment circle.
This netizen said that it seems that Jiang Zemin was right not to withdraw from the Chairman of the Military Commission at that time
My reply is that this is well said, because it is a more popular point of view. Xi Baozi pretended to be like this before he came to power. Who would have thought that he would be like this? Just like the old saying:
Duke Zhou was afraid of rumors
Wang Mang was humble and respectful to his subordinates
If he had died at that time
Who knows the loyalty and flattery of the ages
Wen Jiabao said that only the Spring and Autumn Annals knew me and punished me.
Let me summarize for you. Jiang Zemin stayed in the post of Chairman of the Military Commission for two years. He was criticized for clinging to power, but now he is called a strategic master. It is obvious that if Hu Jintao had followed Jiang Zemin and stayed in the post of Chairman of the Military Commission for two years, Xi Jinping would not have the time and space to amend the Constitution at the 19th National Congress and attempt to be re-elected for life. Can Hu Jintao still help Hu Chunhua become a member of the Politburo Standing Committee and help him get on the horse and send him off? Then Hu Chunhua’s succession to Xi Jinping is a foregone conclusion. Xi Jinping’s desire for a third term is impossible, it can only be a daydream. Wen Jiabao was said to be a movie star when he was in office, but now it is said that Xi Jinping does not even want to act.
Xi Jinping was praised as the son of reformer Xi Zhongxun, but in fact, Xi Zhongxun was not a reformer at all. He was packaged by Zhu Rongji and Xi Jinping. Before Xi Jinping came to power, he was a master of reversing and acceleration. If he had not come to power, who would have thought that he was such a person?
The root of the problem lies with Deng Xiaoping. He did not take the right path, but had to cross the river by feeling the stones. He did not take the democratic system. They insist on dictatorship. To put it bluntly, it is still pragmatism, and they still don’t want to give up the Communist Party’s dictatorship. They know that according to the old model, the Communist Party regime can only collapse, so they have to use the banner of reform as a fig leaf, but in fact, nothing has changed. To put it nicely, there is only economic reform, no political reform. They designed the trick of designating the next generation. Without the constraints of the democratic system, Xi Jinping can’t play it anymore. They can only rely on backroom politics and power tactics. Jiang Zemin stayed as the chairman of the Military Commission for two years, and he got it right by accident.
Originally, Xi Jinping couldn’t play it anymore. Hu Jintao launched a military coup and succeeded temporarily by military adventure. In other words, this residual power is still there, and the general secretary who succeeded Xi Jinping did not dare to be re-elected for life. This is just due to temporary political reality. Anyone who succeeds Xi Jinping, as long as his brain is not broken, will definitely not learn from Xi Jinping. It’s not that he doesn’t want to learn, but there is no opportunity. Learning from Xi Jinping is a dead end. What will happen next is uncertain. No one can predict it. Just wait for the next ambitious person like Xi Jinping to emerge. It is just overestimating the Communist Party. After all, the Communist Party can plan things for 10 years, which is good enough. It is like stepping on a watermelon peel and slipping wherever it falls. Just like the saying, I don’t care about the flood after I die, I can just take care of the things in front of me.
Let’s take a look at this big melon. The melons in the United States are also very exciting, and the melon-eating crowd is a little overwhelmed.
Let’s first briefly sort out the background: the story of the four presidents of the United States. Kennedy was killed by the CIA, and Vice President Johnson took over. He served two terms, a total of more than five years-because the US president can only be re-elected for two terms at most. Nixon was impeached and stepped down in his second term, and Vice President Ford took over with a smile.
Let’s look at this big melon posted by Twitter, which is about to subvert the entire American history. The CIA killed Kennedy, but the Warren Commission cleaned up the mess for the CIA, wrote off the CIA’s guilt, and pardoned the CIA. What is the Warren Commission? The Warren Commission was set up by Johnson, Kennedy’s successor, to investigate the cause of Kennedy’s death.
Nixon knew the truth. Nixon knew that the CIA murdered Kennedy, and four of the five thieves in the Watergate incident were CIA agents. The CIA deliberately set up a trap and fabricated the Watergate incident in order to bring down Nixon and bring him down. Ford was Nixon’s successor selected by the deep government and the CIA, and Ford happened to be a member of the Warren Commission at the time. In other words, it was Ford who let Kennedy’s murderer go, and the deep government rewarded Ford for his merits and gave him a term as president. In other words, Ford gave the deep government a pledge of allegiance to the deep government in exchange for its trust.
This means that Ford is actually the spokesperson for the deep government. This is probably the core content of Trump’s declassified Kennedy files, the ultimate explosive material. In other words, the deep government really exists. Although Kennedy and Nixon belonged to different parties, one was a Democrat and the other was a Republican, they both touched the interests of the deep government, one was silenced, and the other was framed and stepped down.
Now, the bosses of the deep government are obviously Obama and Soros, and Biden is just a little follower of Obama who runs errands and does miscellaneous things, and he can’t come to the stage. In other words, there will be no president in the United States from 2020 to 2024, or the real 46th president of the United States is Obama, and Biden’s four years are just Obama’s third term. OK, thank you everyone.
END