胡锦涛三决策相隔10年再等《人民日报》科学决策、民主决策、依法决策。敲山震虎，逼习退位，还是一鼓作气拿下远亲王，铁帽子王。胡锦涛到底想要什么？2025年7月18日，习近平神秘日期，预定鞭炮
胡锦涛三决策相隔10年再等《人民日报》科学决策、民主决策、依法决策。敲山震虎，逼习退位，还是一鼓作气拿下远亲王，铁帽子王。胡锦涛到底想要什么？2025年7月18日，习近平神秘日期，预定鞭炮
河南省长王凯涉金湘军蓝天立案接受中纪委调查。
大家好，
这名网友说
人民日报，科学决策，民主决策，依法决策，快十年没人提了，终于明显了。
这名网友回复说，
当年天天说胡温演戏，结果上来一个演都不演的才知道这几个词有多动听。
这名网友说
习近平不演戏墙内也一堆人支持他😅
我的回复是，实话实话，这些党八股我真不知道。我上网搜了一下，这还是算是胡锦涛的一个标志性的东西。感谢这名网友的线索。
《人民日报》关于“科学决策、民主决策、依法决策”的提法在过去近十年销声匿迹，2025年5月19日习近平考察洛阳期间重提此语，暗示这一口号的“复活”标志着胡锦涛时代政策的回归，进而推测胡锦涛重掌大权、习近平下台。
胡锦涛时代“科学决策、民主决策、依法决策”的三个代表性论述
胡锦涛执政期间（2002-2012），《人民日报》多次强调“科学决策、民主决策、依法决策”，反映其治国理念注重程序正义、集体领导与法治约束。以下是三个代表性论述：
2004年9月19日，中共十六届四中全会《决定》
《人民日报》报道，胡锦涛在十六届四中全会上提出，要“健全决策机制，完善科学决策、民主决策、依法决策的程序”。胡锦涛强调，重大决策需广泛征求意见，开展专家论证和社会听证，确保决策符合客观规律和人民利益。
此论述的背景，针对2003年非典疫情暴露的决策失误，旨在通过制度化程序提高决策质量，体现胡锦涛“科学发展观”的核心理念。
意义：科学决策突出数据与专家依据，民主决策强调党内协商与民意吸收，依法决策强化法治约束，形成“三位一体”的决策框架。
2007年10月15日，中共十七大报告
胡锦涛在十七大报告中指出：“要坚持科学决策、民主决策、依法决策，健全决策机制和程序，发挥思想库作用，建立决策问责和纠错制度。”《人民日报》全文刊发，强调决策需“广开言路，集思广益”。
背景是2008年汶川地震前，胡锦涛推动决策透明化，如抗震救灾中的信息公开，体现民主决策的实践。
意义是此论述强化决策的群众基础与责任追究，试图平衡集体领导与行政效率，巩固胡锦涛的温和改革形象。
2012年3月5日，十一届全国人大五次会议
胡锦涛在政府工作报告讨论中要求，“完善科学决策、民主决策、依法决策的制度，推进决策公开，增强决策透明度”。《人民日报》评论称，这“三决策”是“中国特色社会主义民主政治的重要保障”。
背景是2012年为胡锦涛执政末期，面对薄熙来事件与党内派系争斗，胡锦涛通过“三决策”强调法治与民主，防范个人权力膨胀。
意义是依法决策被置于突出位置，意在约束地方与高层权力，维护党内集体领导传统。
总结：胡锦涛时代的“三决策”理念贯穿其十年执政，强调程序正义、集体协商与法治约束，旨在通过制度化决策平衡权力、回应民意，体现“科学发展观”的温和治国风格。《人民日报》频繁宣传，凸显其政策核心地位。
习近平时代“三决策”的消失
2012年习近平上台后，“科学决策、民主决策、依法决策”的提法在《人民日报》逐渐淡出，近十年几乎销声匿迹，反映其治国理念的转变。以下从政策话语、媒体宣传与政治实践分析：
政策话语转向“核心意识”与“顶层设计”
习近平执政后，《人民日报》更强调“以习近平同志为核心的党中央”与“顶层设计”。2016年中共十八届六中全会确立习近平“核心”地位，决策话语聚焦“集中统一领导”，淡化民主协商与程序约束。
例证：2017-2022年，《人民日报》提及“科学决策”仅限于技术性领域（如疫情防控），而“民主决策”多被“全过程人民民主”取代，强调选举与协商的广泛性，而非决策程序的民主性。“依法决策”则被“全面依法治国”吸收，但更突出中央权威而非程序正义。
原因：习近平强化个人领导，2018年修宪废除领导人任期制，决策权集中于中央政治局与总书记，削弱了胡锦涛时代集体协商的传统。
媒体宣传的转变
《人民日报》对习近平的报道聚焦个人成就与“习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想”，胡锦涛时代的“三决策”被边缘化。2021年12月13日，《人民日报》发表“改革开放是党的一次伟大觉醒”文章，赞扬邓小平、江泽民、胡锦涛的贡献，却未提习近平，暗示党内对其忽视程序决策的不满。
这应该就是20大前政治斗争的产物。
BBC分数据析显示，2017年习近平姓名在《人民日报》提及频率超江泽民与胡锦涛峰值总和，2019年超毛泽东1976年峰值，反映宣传重心转向个人崇拜，淡化程序性口号。
政治实践的集中化
习近平时代，决策权向中央集中，如2019年孙政才被查、2022年胡春华没有进入政治局，显示接班人制度与集体领导被削弱。2022年中共二十大，胡锦涛被带离会场，象征其派系影响力被压制。
习近平以反腐清除异己（比如孙政才、周永康），决策过程缺乏透明性，专家论证与民意征求被形式化，背离胡锦涛的“三决策”理念。
习近平时代，“科学决策、民主决策、依法决策”在《人民日报》与政策实践中近乎消失，代之以“核心领导”与“顶层设计”，反映决策权的集中化与个人权威的强化，削弱了胡锦涛时代的程序正义与集体协商传统。
2025年“三决策”重提与胡锦涛复权、习近平下台的推测
2025年5月19日，人民日看重提“科学决策、民主决策、依法决策”，要求“十五五”规划编制需“把顶层设计和问计于民统一起来，广泛凝聚共识”。《人民日报》强调此提法对推进中国式现代化意义重大。
我只能说人民日报也挺缝合的。
之前我说，有的网友推特上有一个胡春华2009年注册账号。有人说是高仿。这个无所谓，就算是高仿，模仿得也很像。这个胡春华不管真假，他复述的都是他干爹胡锦涛的话。胡锦涛说，他要上网了解民意，汇集民智，这句话和问计于民是同一个意思。现在这句话已经冠冕堂皇的登上了新华网，人民网，党媒党刊。习近平的顶层设计和胡锦涛的问计于民还缝合起来了。
再加上胡锦涛的“科学决策、民主决策、依法决策”。这一提法沉寂近十年后“复活”，标志着胡锦涛时代政策的回归，暗示胡锦涛重掌大权、习近平下台。这很明显是中共党内的一次路线斗争。
结合近期的动向称胡锦涛派系联合江泽民派系清算习近平亲信（比如苗华、何卫东），彭丽媛新闻被删，显示习近平丧失大权。2022年二十大胡锦涛被带离会场，象征其派系被压制，2025年“三决策”重提可能反映胡派通过党内舆论（如《人民日报》）夺回话语权。
这名网友说，
河南开会，新闻联播有一个近景镜头气相很不好。
我的回复是，
这个确实，习近平讲话之前，大家看，有气无力，感觉马上嗝屁了。讲话中间呢，还来一点精气神，而且习近平嘴唇发黑，中毒了一样。
李克强最后一次公开出现是2023年8月30日在甘肃省敦煌莫高窟。从X（前推特）发布的影片来看，李克强微笑着向游客招手，看到李克强的数百名游客也热情地问候道：“总理，您好。”中国媒体没有报道李克强访问敦煌的消息，微博等中国社交媒体上也看不到相关内容。
我们看时间线
李克强2023年8月30日，最后一次公开出现在甘肃省敦煌莫高窟。
2023年10月27日，李克强就嗝屁了。
习近平2025年5月20日，去了龙门石窟。
按照李克强时间线推测呢，58天之后就是2025年7月18日。
那么2025年7月18日会不会有大事发生，我不知道啊。没有人能够预见未来。如果，2025年7月18日，发生大事了，跟我毛关系没有。不要回来考古。我不是预言家。准备鞭炮吧，也许有大事发生呢。
这名网友说，
看来胡锦涛在把周恩来陈云派系在军队势力连根拔起之后，在政治上也开始彻底的铲除习近平派系在地方上的山头势力，同时剑指习远平，这可能也是敲山震虎，逼他退位的。也可能就是奔着习远平和习近平本人去的。要是把这些势力彻底铲除了，政治改革还是有那么一丝希望的。
我的回复是，胡锦涛到底想干嘛呢？首先铁帽子王确定就是习远平，蓝天立的级别，差点意思。但是到底是敲山震虎，逼习近平退位还是要直接拿下习远平，习近平，那就不知道了。
这是韦彦，当时是广西贵港市的副市长。韦彦是蓝天立老婆韦霄燕的弟弟或者堂弟。很多的瓜，要一锅端，团灭。这个等我给大家展开说说。
好的，谢谢大家。
英文翻译
Hu Jintao’s three decisions were made 10 years apart. People’s Daily made scientific, democratic and legal decisions. To force Xi to abdicate, or to take down the distant prince and the iron hat king in one go. What does Hu Jintao want? July 18, 2025, Xi Jinping’s mysterious date, ordered firecrackers
Henan Governor Wang Kai was investigated by the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection for his involvement in Jin Xiangjun Lantian.
Hello everyone,
This netizen said
People’s Daily, scientific decision-making, democratic decision-making, and legal decision-making, no one has mentioned it for almost ten years, and it is finally obvious.
This netizen replied,
Back then, people said that Hu and Wen were acting every day, but when they came up and didn’t act at all, they knew how beautiful these words were.
This netizen said
Xi Jinping doesn’t act, and there are still a lot of people in the wall who support him😅
My reply is, to be honest, I really don’t know these party jargons. I searched the Internet and found that this is still a symbol of Hu Jintao. Thanks to this netizen for the clue.
The phrase “scientific decision-making, democratic decision-making, and decision-making in accordance with the law” in the People’s Daily has disappeared in the past decade. On May 19, 2025, Xi Jinping mentioned this phrase again during his inspection in Luoyang, suggesting that the “resurrection” of this slogan marks the return of the policy of the Hu Jintao era, and further speculates that Hu Jintao will return to power and Xi Jinping will step down.
Three representative statements of “scientific decision-making, democratic decision-making, and decision-making in accordance with the law” in the Hu Jintao era
During Hu Jintao’s administration (2002-2012), the People’s Daily repeatedly emphasized “scientific decision-making, democratic decision-making, and decision-making in accordance with the law”, reflecting his concept of governing the country, which focuses on procedural justice, collective leadership and legal constraints. The following are three representative statements:
September 19, 2004, the “Decision” of the Fourth Plenary Session of the 16th CPC Central Committee
The People’s Daily reported that Hu Jintao proposed at the Fourth Plenary Session of the 16th CPC Central Committee to “improve the decision-making mechanism and improve the procedures for scientific decision-making, democratic decision-making, and decision-making in accordance with the law.” Hu Jintao emphasized that major decisions need to be widely consulted, expert discussions and social hearings should be carried out to ensure that decisions are in line with objective laws and the interests of the people.
The background of this statement is aimed at improving the quality of decision-making through institutionalized procedures in response to the decision-making errors exposed by the SARS epidemic in 2003, reflecting the core concept of Hu Jintao’s “Scientific Outlook on Development”.
Significance: Scientific decision-making emphasizes data and expert basis, democratic decision-making emphasizes intra-party consultation and absorption of public opinion, and legal decision-making strengthens legal constraints, forming a “three-in-one” decision-making framework.
October 15, 2007, the report of the 17th National Congress of the Communist Party of China
Hu Jintao pointed out in the report of the 17th National Congress: “We must adhere to scientific decision-making, democratic decision-making, and legal decision-making, improve decision-making mechanisms and procedures, give full play to the role of think tanks, and establish a decision-making accountability and error correction system.” The full text of the People’s Daily was published, emphasizing that decision-making needs to “open up channels for speech and gather wisdom from all sides.”
The background is that before the Wenchuan earthquake in 2008, Hu Jintao promoted transparency in decision-making, such as information disclosure in earthquake relief and disaster relief, reflecting the practice of democratic decision-making.
The significance is that this statement strengthens the mass basis and accountability of decision-making, attempts to balance collective leadership and administrative efficiency, and consolidates Hu Jintao’s image of moderate reform.
On March 5, 2012, at the Fifth Session of the Eleventh National People’s Congress, Hu Jintao demanded in the discussion of the government work report that “the system of scientific, democratic and legal decision-making should be improved, and the openness of decision-making should be promoted and the transparency of decision-making should be enhanced”. The People’s Daily commented that these “three decisions” are “an important guarantee for socialist democracy with Chinese characteristics”. The background is that 2012 was the end of Hu Jintao’s administration. Facing the Bo Xilai incident and factional struggles within the party, Hu Jintao emphasized the rule of law and democracy through the “three decisions” to prevent the expansion of personal power. The significance is that legal decision-making is placed in a prominent position, which is intended to constrain local and high-level power and maintain the tradition of collective leadership within the party. Summary: The concept of “three decisions” in the Hu Jintao era runs through his ten years in power, emphasizing procedural justice, collective consultation and legal constraints, aiming to balance power and respond to public opinion through institutionalized decision-making, reflecting the moderate governance style of the “Scientific Outlook on Development”. The People’s Daily frequently publicizes it, highlighting its core position in policy. The disappearance of the “three decisions” in the Xi Jinping era
After Xi Jinping came to power in 2012, the term “scientific decision-making, democratic decision-making, and legal decision-making” gradually faded out of the People’s Daily and almost disappeared in the past decade, reflecting the change in his concept of governing the country. The following analysis is based on policy discourse, media propaganda and political practice:
Policy discourse shifts to “core consciousness” and “top-level design”
After Xi Jinping came to power, the People’s Daily emphasized “the Party Central Committee with Comrade Xi Jinping as the core” and “top-level design”. The Sixth Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee in 2016 established Xi Jinping’s “core” status, and the decision-making discourse focused on “centralized and unified leadership”, downplaying democratic consultation and procedural constraints.
Example: From 2017 to 2022, the People’s Daily mentioned that “scientific decision-making” was limited to technical fields (such as epidemic prevention and control), while “democratic decision-making” was mostly replaced by “full-process people’s democracy”, emphasizing the extensiveness of elections and consultations rather than the democracy of decision-making procedures. “Law-based decision-making” was absorbed by “comprehensive rule of law”, but it emphasized the central authority rather than procedural justice.
Reason: Xi Jinping strengthened his personal leadership. The 2018 constitutional amendment abolished the term limit for leaders, and decision-making power was concentrated in the Central Political Bureau and the General Secretary, weakening the tradition of collective consultation in the Hu Jintao era.
Changes in media propaganda
The People’s Daily’s coverage of Xi Jinping focused on personal achievements and “Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era”, and the “three decisions” of the Hu Jintao era were marginalized. On December 13, 2021, the People’s Daily published an article entitled “Reform and Opening Up is a Great Awakening of the Party”, praising the contributions of Deng Xiaoping, Jiang Zemin, and Hu Jintao, but did not mention Xi Jinping, implying dissatisfaction within the party with its neglect of procedural decision-making.
This should be the product of the political struggle before the 20th National Congress.
BBC data analysis shows that in 2017, the frequency of Xi Jinping’s name being mentioned in the People’s Daily exceeded the peak sum of Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao, and in 2019 exceeded Mao Zedong’s peak in 1976, reflecting that the focus of propaganda has shifted to personal worship and downplayed procedural slogans.
Centralization of political practice
In the Xi Jinping era, decision-making power was centralized to the central government. For example, Sun Zhengcai was investigated in 2019 and Hu Chunhua did not enter the Politburo in 2022, indicating that the successor system and collective leadership were weakened. At the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China in 2022, Hu Jintao was taken away from the venue, symbolizing that his factional influence was suppressed.
Xi Jinping used anti-corruption to eliminate dissidents (such as Sun Zhengcai and Zhou Yongkang). The decision-making process lacked transparency, and expert argumentation and public opinion solicitation were formalized, deviating from Hu Jintao’s “three decision-making” concept.
In the Xi Jinping era, “scientific decision-making, democratic decision-making, and legal decision-making” almost disappeared in the People’s Daily and policy practice, and were replaced by “core leadership” and “top-level design”, reflecting the centralization of decision-making power and the strengthening of personal authority, weakening the procedural justice and collective consultation tradition of the Hu Jintao era.
The re-mention of the “three decisions” in 2025 and the speculation that Hu Jintao will regain power and Xi Jinping will step down
On May 19, 2025, the People’s Daily re-mention of “scientific decision-making, democratic decision-making, and decision-making in accordance with the law”, requiring the compilation of the “15th Five-Year Plan” to “unify top-level design and consult with the people, and build consensus widely”. The People’s Daily emphasized that this proposal is of great significance to the promotion of Chinese-style modernization.
I can only say that the People’s Daily is also quite stitched.
I said before that some netizens have an account registered by Hu Chunhua on Twitter in 2009. Some people say it is a high imitation. It doesn’t matter. Even if it is a high imitation, it is very similar. Regardless of whether this Hu Chunhua is true or false, he repeats the words of his godfather Hu Jintao. Hu Jintao said that he would go online to understand public opinion and gather people’s wisdom. This sentence has the same meaning as consult with the people. Now this sentence has been published on Xinhuanet, People’s Daily, and party media and party publications. Xi Jinping’s top-level design and Hu Jintao’s consult with the people are stitched together.
In addition, Hu Jintao’s “scientific decision-making, democratic decision-making, and decision-making in accordance with the law” was added. This term was “resurrected” after being silent for nearly ten years, marking the return of the policies of the Hu Jintao era, implying that Hu Jintao would regain power and Xi Jinping would step down. This is clearly a line struggle within the Communist Party of China.
Combined with recent trends, it is said that Hu Jintao’s faction joined Jiang Zemin’s faction to liquidate Xi Jinping’s confidants (such as Miao Hua and He Weidong), and the news about Peng Liyuan was deleted, indicating that Xi Jinping has lost power. Hu Jintao was taken away from the venue of the 20th National Congress in 2022, symbolizing that his faction was suppressed. The re-mention of the “three decisions” in 2025 may reflect that the Hu faction has regained the right to speak through the party’s public opinion (such as the People’s Daily).
This netizen said,
There was a close-up shot of the news broadcast at a meeting in Henan, and the atmosphere was very bad.
My reply was,
This is indeed the case. Before Xi Jinping spoke, everyone saw that he was weak and felt that he was about to die. In the middle of the speech, he was still a little energetic, and Xi Jinping’s lips were black, as if he was poisoned.
Li Keqiang’s last public appearance was at the Mogao Grottoes in Dunhuang, Gansu Province on August 30, 2023. From the video posted by X (former Twitter), Li Keqiang smiled and waved to tourists, and hundreds of tourists who saw Li Keqiang also greeted him enthusiastically: “Hello, Prime Minister.” Chinese media did not report the news of Li Keqiang’s visit to Dunhuang, and no relevant content was seen on Chinese social media such as Weibo.
Let’s look at the timeline
Li Keqiang’s last public appearance was at the Mogao Grottoes in Dunhuang, Gansu Province on August 30, 2023.
On October 27, 2023, Li Keqiang died.
Xi Jinping went to the Longmen Grottoes on May 20, 2025.
According to Li Keqiang’s timeline, 58 days later is July 18, 2025.
So whether something big will happen on July 18, 2025, I don’t know. No one can predict the future. If something big happens on July 18, 2025, it has nothing to do with me. Don’t come back to do archaeology. I’m not a prophet. Prepare firecrackers, maybe something big is going to happen.
This netizen said,
It seems that after Hu Jintao uprooted the Zhou Enlai and Chen Yun faction in the military, he also began to thoroughly eradicate the local forces of the Xi Jinping faction in politics, and at the same time pointed his sword at Xi Yuanping. This may also be a warning to force him to step down. It may also be aimed at Xi Yuanping and Xi Jinping himself. If these forces are completely eradicated, there is still a glimmer of hope for political reform.
My reply is, what exactly does Hu Jintao want to do? First of all, the iron hat king is definitely Xi Yuanping, Lan Tianli’s level, which is not good enough. But whether it is to warn the tiger and force Xi Jinping to step down or to directly take down Xi Yuanping and Xi Jinping, I don’t know.
This is Wei Yan, who was the deputy mayor of Guigang City, Guangxi at the time. Wei Yan is the younger brother or cousin of Lan Tianli’s wife Wei Xiaoyan. There are many melons, and they have to be wiped out in one pot. Let me explain this to you.
Okay, thank you everyone.
END